Tiny cameras

No focusing assistance included. Take your best guess.
Post Reply
User avatar
melek
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1098
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:04 pm
Contact:

Tiny cameras

Post by melek »

Image
From left: Balda CE 35, Ricoh FF-1, Chinon Bellami and Olympus XA.

In the 1970s, the tiny camera craze took hold. I don't recall if they were an answer to the Rollei 35, which had been around for years before these arrived.

But they are all nice little cameras.

The Balda CE 35 might have been the last Balda-branded camera. Or maybe not. There was an identical Voigtlander Vito C camera.

All three cameras had matching flash units. The Balda and Olympus flash units attach to the side, while the other two are small units that slide into each camera's hot shoe.

The Olympus XA has rangefinder focusing, while the other three are scale focus.


-Mike Elek
User avatar
Philip
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Tiny cameras

Post by Philip »

Nice set of 'em. They are fun to use.

I've also got an Agfa Compact which is like a clunky XA. Same period -- late 1970s, early 1980s.
My Flickrs: http://www.flickr.com/flipflik (recent postings), or
- http://www.flickriver.com/photos/flipfl ... teresting/ (Flickr's calculation of my "most interesting" pics);
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/flipflik/s ... 879115542/ (what I like best).
Santiago Montenegro
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:06 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny cameras

Post by Santiago Montenegro »

I think they came as an answer to the Minox 35, which caused quite a stir back in the early 70's. I craved for one when they first came out.

As time passed and I could afford them, I can say the Minox 35s are the cameras I love to hate. Wonderful ergonomics, incredible lens, cute as they come... and then the shutter fails. :roll:
titrisol
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 9:14 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny cameras

Post by titrisol »

You mean this?
ImageMinox35 GT by Pablo Coronel, on Flickr

It is a cool little camera, I also wanted one badly and finally got one (25+ years later) for free. I got it before it hit the trashcan in my former job (leftover from an old colleague that retired). I travelled quite a lot with it, and loved the look on the younger kids when I pulled it off my pocket.
If you can't fix it with a hammer... you got an electrical problem
even duct tape can't fix stupid.... but it can muffle it (SilentObserver)
My Flickr -ipernity
Thanks CE Nelson ;)
Santiago Montenegro
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:06 am
Contact:

Re: Tiny cameras

Post by Santiago Montenegro »

Eggsactly! I gutted one and I've been working hard to adapt the lens into M mount. Not an easy task. Maybe I'll call it quits and go E mount, which will be a breeze.
User avatar
melek
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1098
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Tiny cameras

Post by melek »

I forgot about the Minox 35 cameras. :oops:

My success in finding a good one has not been good. I think that I've bought maybe five or six of them. Only one works correctly.
-Mike Elek
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1276
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Tiny cameras

Post by Julio1fer »

Those tiny 35mm are so practical for travel! You have a nice set, Mike. Can you compare them? Any favorite?

I have only used the XA and the Kiev 35 (a copy of the Minox, very good lens but it is also unreliable).

At some time I have looked for all of these, but now I am happy just with the XA.
User avatar
melek
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1098
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Tiny cameras

Post by melek »

The Minox has been a frustrating experience for me. I've owned a number of these, and only one has proved to be reliable.

All had the dreaded unreliable shutter problem. I've read a number of things about servicing the shutter, but I haven't been successful in bringing any of them back to life.

Here's a photo that I took with a Minox GL. This was shot on Kodak Plus-X film. The indicated shutter speed was supposed to be about 1/100, but I heard the shutter open and close, and it was closer to 1/10.

Even so, I like this photo. In this case, the blur made it seem more real.

Image
-Mike Elek
User avatar
Philip
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 494
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:24 pm
Contact:

Re: Tiny cameras

Post by Philip »

Oooo, my kind of picture!
My Flickrs: http://www.flickr.com/flipflik (recent postings), or
- http://www.flickriver.com/photos/flipfl ... teresting/ (Flickr's calculation of my "most interesting" pics);
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/flipflik/s ... 879115542/ (what I like best).
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest