WalMart developing

If you need to unleash a rant or just have something that you want to say, you can post it here. It doesn't have to be about photography.
Post Reply
scott
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 697
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 11:06 am
Contact:

WalMart developing

Post by scott »

Hi, all -

While killing time during volleyball practice yesterday I was milling around WalMart. Walked by what used to be the photo center and they had a "Film Dropoff" sign. Hmm, thinks I, I wonder if they still process? Long story short, no. They mail out. But I looked at the envelope. And there, in bold letters, "Negatives will NOT be returned." They send you a CD with scans and any prints you want. THEY keep the film. WTF? Who thinks that's a good idea?

I'd have asked about it but there wasn't anyone working in the department. Go figure.


User avatar
melek
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1121
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:04 pm
Contact:

Re: WalMart developing

Post by melek »

This is why I'm willing to pay a bit more and have my photos AND negatives returned to me.

And of course, you don't have to listen to some smart-ass clerk comment about you "still using film."


-Mike Elek
User avatar
PFMcFarland
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 2391
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: WalMart developing

Post by PFMcFarland »

It still amazes me that no one has sued them for theft of intellectual property. Of course, you have to let them take your film first to be able to claim such, and then they can just point to their plainly advertised policy, of which you summarily agreed to when you handed over said unprocessed film. I quit using Walmart years ago when I finally realized it wasn't the cameras I was using that were bad, but their scanning. That was just before they started keeping the negatives.

PF


Waiting for the light
r-brian
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:18 pm
Contact:

Re: WalMart developing

Post by r-brian »

And what's worse is the scans you get back are low resolution with dust and other foreign crap on them; totally useless.


User avatar
Martolod
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:41 am
Contact:

Re: WalMart developing

Post by Martolod »

r-brian wrote:And what's worse is the scans you get back are low resolution with dust and other foreign crap on them; totally useless.
sounds like SOP for walmart and most of the junk they sell....(or so i am told)


Sharpness is a bourgeois concept ~ Cartier-Bresson
User avatar
OpenWater
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:24 am
Contact:

Re: WalMart developing

Post by OpenWater »

It has been many, many years since I have given them any money for anything. I feel sorry for people, such as my in-laws, who must shop there. I might add that my in-laws have Walmart as their only shoppping choice because Walmart drove the other merchants in their very small town out of business. Perhaps Amazon will drive Walmart out of business? I miss the corner drug store.


User avatar
GrahamS
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: WalMart developing

Post by GrahamS »

We used to have a mini-lab on our high street that kept their equipment and process up to scratch and would do anything we wanted, like develop only and then print only what we wanted, or enlarge to non-standard sizes or process a clip from a film first as a test. They are no longer there. Sad.

I tried our local ASDA (WallMart) when they first opened. My negatives were returned scratched and badly cut - in fact some cuts were through the centre of the frame. When I complained, the the counter hand remarked "So what! Most people throw the negatives away anyhow."

I have never been back.


GrahamS
Age brings wisdom....or age shows up alone. You never know.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest