Zorki-6 No2 Testing

Talk about rangefinder cameras, lenses and accessories.
Post Reply
User avatar
PFMcFarland
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 2407
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:02 pm
Contact:

Zorki-6 No2 Testing

Post by PFMcFarland »

I had to replace my original Zorki-6 as it was so badly mangled by the previous owner it was cheaper to just get another one.

After checking the shutter for capping, I put in some seal material (black thread) along the door channels, having learned my lesson from earlier FSU cameras. Loaded with Kodak 100T-Max, I started out using the I-26M, then for the second part of the test switched to the I-22 I had cleaned out last winter. Both lenses performed well, and are matched to the rangefinder.

I usually don’t use a meter, as I find it just gets in the way sometimes, especially if you don’t have a shirt pocket to slip it into. But I could have used one when I went up a mountain road deep into the woods. Though the negatives from that part of the roll were very thin, most of the images were recoverable in PSE10. The lack of a shutter speed slower than 1/30 hampered my idea of showing movement in the water coming down the mountain, but the camera did not cap when I put it on 1/500, and exposures were even across the frame.

I think I’ve got a winner!

Yes, I take photos of people sometimes I-26M
Image
Redcoat by P F McFarland, on Flickr


No capping at 1/500 I-26M
Image
Montgomery Tunnels by P F McFarland, on Flickr


Mid-range focus check I-22
Image
Emerging by P F McFarland, on Flickr


Center-cut I-22
Image
Emerging Crop by P F McFarland, on Flickr


Needs some work I-22
Image
Thin Negative by P F McFarland, on Flickr


After a lot of work I-22
Image
Poplar Glow by P F McFarland, on Flickr


This might look better if I crop that culvert at the bottom I-22
Image
Rocky Drop by P F McFarland, on Flickr

See all the test photos at https://flic.kr/s/aHskEC6gK1 and https://flic.kr/s/aHskGijxo3

PF


Waiting for the light
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1311
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Zorki-6 No2 Testing

Post by Julio1fer »

Looks like an able instrument! The corrected version of the poplar leaves is great; nice tones there.

The I-26m is a very sharp, underrated lens.


Brazile
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 7:22 am
Contact:

Re: Zorki-6 No2 Testing

Post by Brazile »

Nice set, PF. Looks like your preemptive strike on the light leaks was effective...

Robert


User avatar
PFMcFarland
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 2407
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Zorki-6 No2 Testing

Post by PFMcFarland »

Thanks, guys. I'm happy with this camera, as it has none of the visible problems most of my FSU rangefinders do, such as spots of verdigris all over the place. It was obviously well cared for, and shows no sign of having been tampered with. Now I'll have to get some Jupiter lenses for it.

PF


Waiting for the light
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests