I had to replace my original Zorki-6 as it was so badly mangled by the previous owner it was cheaper to just get another one.
After checking the shutter for capping, I put in some seal material (black thread) along the door channels, having learned my lesson from earlier FSU cameras. Loaded with Kodak 100T-Max, I started out using the I-26M, then for the second part of the test switched to the I-22 I had cleaned out last winter. Both lenses performed well, and are matched to the rangefinder.
I usually don’t use a meter, as I find it just gets in the way sometimes, especially if you don’t have a shirt pocket to slip it into. But I could have used one when I went up a mountain road deep into the woods. Though the negatives from that part of the roll were very thin, most of the images were recoverable in PSE10. The lack of a shutter speed slower than 1/30 hampered my idea of showing movement in the water coming down the mountain, but the camera did not cap when I put it on 1/500, and exposures were even across the frame.
I think I’ve got a winner!
Yes, I take photos of people sometimes I-26M
Redcoat by P F McFarland, on Flickr
No capping at 1/500 I-26M
Montgomery Tunnels by P F McFarland, on Flickr
Mid-range focus check I-22
Emerging by P F McFarland, on Flickr
Center-cut I-22
Emerging Crop by P F McFarland, on Flickr
Needs some work I-22
Thin Negative by P F McFarland, on Flickr
After a lot of work I-22
Poplar Glow by P F McFarland, on Flickr
This might look better if I crop that culvert at the bottom I-22
Rocky Drop by P F McFarland, on Flickr
See all the test photos at https://flic.kr/s/aHskEC6gK1 and https://flic.kr/s/aHskGijxo3
PF
Zorki-6 No2 Testing
- PFMcFarland
- Super Member
- Posts: 2407
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Zorki-6 No2 Testing
Looks like an able instrument! The corrected version of the poplar leaves is great; nice tones there.
The I-26m is a very sharp, underrated lens.
The I-26m is a very sharp, underrated lens.
Re: Zorki-6 No2 Testing
Nice set, PF. Looks like your preemptive strike on the light leaks was effective...
Robert
Robert
- PFMcFarland
- Super Member
- Posts: 2407
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Zorki-6 No2 Testing
Thanks, guys. I'm happy with this camera, as it has none of the visible problems most of my FSU rangefinders do, such as spots of verdigris all over the place. It was obviously well cared for, and shows no sign of having been tampered with. Now I'll have to get some Jupiter lenses for it.
PF
PF
Waiting for the light
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests