Home-made D-76 test

Questions and answers about developing film, enlarging and making your own prints. Also, topics on scanning your negatives, transparencies and photos.
Post Reply
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1311
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Contact:

Home-made D-76 test

Post by Julio1fer »

From the abandoned darkroom of my late father, I salvaged some chemicals in those old dark chemists flasks, that must be at least 50-60 years old. There was some brownish Metol, good-looking Hydroquinone, and some borax, along with lots of sulfite and hyposulfite.

I decided to try the old D-76 we used to make at home from these same chemicals 50 years ago. The formula is well-known. The developer came out slighty brownish. I tested it with a Delta 400 roll, a gift from a friend two years ago, for sure already expired when received. Just wanted to see it the chemicals would work at all. The camera for the test was the Spotmatic, with 50mmTessar and Takumars 28mm and 200mm.

Small boat in harbor

Image

Abandoned fishing vessels, in Bella Vista area.

Image

Image

A foot race was on in the Rambla. Very warm afternoon, so the watering post was very busy. The street was littered with plastic bottles, but I was surprised to see a team coming just after the race and picking all the plastic refuse. This city is losing its character. I got a shot of the water guys and gals with the 200 mm.

Image

Image

Image

Industrial landscape, La Teja oil refinery from Capurro area, quite overexposed negative.

Image

The home-made D-76 seems workable, at least in stock solution. These chemicals have a long life!

I have no references to compare results and evaluate, because this is the first time I use Delta 400. I overexposed some shots on purpose; they came out really dense; my V600 scanner had a hard time penetrating the darkness. The soup seems powerful enough.

Next step, a test with Pan F+ which is a better known film. Stay tuned.


User avatar
PFMcFarland
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 2407
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Home-made D-76 test

Post by PFMcFarland »

Good work with the film and developer, Julio. It's always amazing to see what old film and chemicals will do.

PF


Waiting for the light
minoly
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 297
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:41 am
Contact:

Re: Home-made D-76 test

Post by minoly »

Those are really good results! And the test has some positive implications for film users.

Bill Delehanty


User avatar
jamesmck
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 461
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:14 pm
Contact:

Re: Home-made D-76 test

Post by jamesmck »

Nice work, Julio. Your father would be proud of you, I am sure.


James McKearney
P C Headland
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 5:20 am
Contact:

Re: Home-made D-76 test

Post by P C Headland »

Seems to have worked pretty well. IIRC, Delta 400 isn't the most forgiving of films either.

I've still got several bottles of PC-TEA that I made up a few years ago, and at the rate I'm shooting film, it'll probably last me a life time :shh: Good job it seems to have a long shelf life.


LarryD
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Home-made D-76 test

Post by LarryD »

:clap:


If we all saw the world the same no one would need a camera.
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1311
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Home-made D-76 test

Post by Julio1fer »

The Pan-F+ test came out sharp indeed. D-76 gives a lot less grain than Beutler, but then the compensating action is gone. It works, but I'd rather do it in Beutler with this contrasty film.

Image

I have some HP5+ in 120 that must be used (maybe in vacations). I am still undecided about the developer to use. It could be either this D-76 with old chemicals, or a can of D-23 which is about the same age.


LarryD
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Home-made D-76 test

Post by LarryD »

I just sent some Acufine to a friend to figure out all the chemistry maybe we can make that again too. We got it down to but one secret buffer in it.
Diafine is next as we already have Panthermic 77 almost ready.


If we all saw the world the same no one would need a camera.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests