Page 1 of 1
Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 10:22 am
by melek
A friend of my daughter's needs a film camera for a college course.
I was going to loan her a Pentax K1000, but apparently I sold that last year. It's possible that the camera will be lost or stolen or possibly banged around.
Possible choices:
* 1980s Vivitar K mount
* Pentak KX
* Pentax ME Super
* Nikkormat FT3
* Olympus OM-1
I also was thinking of a little 1970s rangefinder, but I think the course probably requires manual exposure controls. The little Olympus 35 RC would be nice, but it also would require me to teach her how to use a rangefinder. I guess that I'll scrap that idea.
I'm leaning toward the Vivitar with the K mount. It's a decent enough camera, and if/when something happens to it, I really won't care that much.
Re: Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 11:53 am
by Captain Slack
I'd go with the Vivtar or the ME Super. What lens or lenses is she getting with it?
Re: Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 12:59 pm
by jamesmck
Captain Slack wrote:I'd go with the Vivtar or the ME Super. What lens or lenses is she getting with it?
I second that for the ME.
Re: Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 6:45 pm
by Julio1fer
The Vivitar would be a very good choice.
Re: Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 6:54 pm
by Philip
The K-mount camera gives her a good chance to buy other inexpensive lenses that fit. But the OM-1 is a beautifully solid camera. . . .
Re: Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:57 am
by Bennybee
All over the web the K1000 is said to be THE beginner/school camera, but I'm not sure about that. Unless you really want a K bayonet, then maybe yes. I'd go for the Nikkormat because it's big and strong. And if you go for a M42 screw thread mount, I would choose a Praktica MTL5 or MTL50.
Re: Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:28 am
by OpenWater
They all look like good options. I prefer the feel in my hand of my ME Super to the K1000. But the nice part about the K1000 for a beginner is that all of the controls are very obvious and that there are not too many of them. Less is sometimes more. (I've got a couple of extra ones - K1000 - if she would like one - no guarantees on condition.) The KX receives very high reviews on PentaxForums, so that would certainly be an option. And I certainly wouldn't knock most anything made by Nikon or Olympus.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/camerarevie ... ax-kx.html
Re: Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:09 pm
by BurninFilm
I don't understand all the hype about the Pentax K1000. Sure, it's a solid and dependable K-mount SLR, but it doesn't even have a DOF preview feature. When learning photography, figuring out how to use DOF properly is very important. Consequently, I don't really think it's the best "starter" 35mm SLR out there.
There are SOOOOO many other good options, no need to get stuck with a camera lacking an incredibly useful feature.
Re: Camera for a first-timer
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:59 pm
by melek
So, I ended up providing a Pentax ME Super. I dropped in new seals and batteries.
I found and printed a PDF of the manual.
"How do I insert the batteries and what kind?"
Reply: Use a nickel or quarter and twist to the left. Those are new batteries. You don't need to replace them. Buy silver oxide - not alkaline.
Finally, read the owner's manual that I printed.