Fashion shoot in 1966

Often simply written as "W/NW" - your favorite photos. Explain them, or let your photos (film or digital) speak for themselves.
Post Reply
User avatar
GrahamS
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:49 am
Contact:

Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by GrahamS »

More B&W images from my archive. These images are from a fashion shoot that I did in around 1966. I used a Zenza Bronica S2 with a Nikkor-P 75mm f2.8 lens, loaded with Kodak Verichrome Pan 120 film rated at 320 ASA, processed in Accufine. The client was a women's magazine called Huisgenoot.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


GrahamS
Age brings wisdom....or age shows up alone. You never know.
User avatar
melek
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1137
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by melek »

Graham - definitely shots from a different era, although the approach to this kind of shoot doesn't change. Did you have an assistant loading backs? Or did you preload a bunch yourself? I did some runway shoots a few years ago, and the experience was great but very different from what you shoot. Did you use some reflectors and umbrellas? Any fill lights?


-Mike Elek
titrisol
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 746
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2014 9:14 am
Contact:

Re: Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by titrisol »

Great shots
Huisgenoot!= House Companion in Afrikaans
The African version of YOU magazine; it had one of the largest circulation until a few years ago.


If you can't fix it with a hammer... you got an electrical problem
even duct tape can't fix stupid.... but it can muffle it (SilentObserver)
My Flickr -ipernity
Thanks CE Nelson ;)
User avatar
GrahamS
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by GrahamS »

melek wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 7:27 am
Graham - definitely shots from a different era, although the approach to this kind of shoot doesn't change. Did you have an assistant loading backs? Or did you preload a bunch yourself? I did some runway shoots a few years ago, and the experience was great but very different from what you shoot. Did you use some reflectors and umbrellas? Any fill lights?
Only one back, but two inserts. All I used was fill flash, a big Metz unit, took a long time to recycle (which resulted in some of the shots not having a full discharge) and which limited the shutter speed to 1/125th. No assistant, just my then girlfriend acting as a gopher. Now she is my wife, and I'm the gopher.


GrahamS
Age brings wisdom....or age shows up alone. You never know.
User avatar
GrahamS
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by GrahamS »

titrisol wrote:
Fri Apr 23, 2021 11:40 am
Great shots
Huisgenoot!= House Companion in Afrikaans
The African version of YOU magazine; it had one of the largest circulation until a few years ago.
That's the one!


GrahamS
Age brings wisdom....or age shows up alone. You never know.
Julio1fer
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1341
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by Julio1fer »

Beautiful, took me back to my youth. Light looks well balanced. I remember those old Metz Mecablitz units.


User avatar
GrahamS
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by GrahamS »

Julio1fer wrote:
Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:41 pm
Beautiful, took me back to my youth. Light looks well balanced. I remember those old Metz Mecablitz units.
The reflector was round and 15cm in diameter! lead acid battery. Beautiful light quality.


GrahamS
Age brings wisdom....or age shows up alone. You never know.
User avatar
PFMcFarland
Super Member
Super Member
Posts: 2407
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by PFMcFarland »

I at first wondered if you used a reflector but then there would have been side shadows on the faces, so I figured it had to be flash. And it wasn't harsh enough to be bulbs. Good work there, Graham.


Waiting for the light
User avatar
GrahamS
Prolific Poster
Prolific Poster
Posts: 1068
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: Fashion shoot in 1966

Post by GrahamS »

PFMcFarland wrote:
Wed Apr 28, 2021 7:13 pm
I at first wondered if you used a reflector but then there would have been side shadows on the faces, so I figured it had to be flash. And it wasn't harsh enough to be bulbs. Good work there, Graham.
Thank you, sir.


GrahamS
Age brings wisdom....or age shows up alone. You never know.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests