Page 1 of 1
mooning you
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:49 pm
by Dennis Gallus
Re: mooning you
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:27 am
by Martolod
lovely
we had a blood moon down here'i have literally just come back from shooting ...will post once i get son post process out of the way
Re: mooning you
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:07 am
by jamesmck
Very nice, Dennis. I imagine exposure was pretty tricky. Is this full-frame digital? I'd like to see a big print of number one.
--- James
Re: mooning you
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:44 am
by Dennis Gallus
Martolod, I look forward to seeing your blood moon shots. I had intended to stay awake to see the total eclipse last night, but I slept instead.
James, these shots were taken with the full-frame Nikon D700 and 24-85mm/3.5-4.5 zoom. I love this combination! I have learned from experience that I have to use exposure compensation for shots of the moon. On nights like last night, with the moonrise about 20 minutes before sunset, I subtracted 0.3 stops. When the moon rises later with respect to sunset, I subtract as much as a full stop to make the photo similar to what my eye sees. (This is with matrix metering set in the camera.)
The wildfire is now burning more than 400 acres of the Coronado National Forest, still uncontrolled. Looking on a map, I now see that the fire is much closer than I originally estimated, about 12-15 miles from my home. The smoke might make for some good color in the sunset and moonrise tonight. (I'm just trying to put a positive spin on a bad fire situation!)
I appreciate your comments, as always. Comments are few and far between.
Re: mooning you
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:35 am
by GrahamS
Dennis, your moon shots get better every time - practice makes perfect. We missed the blood moon because of cloud, so I couldn't even try!
Re: mooning you
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:06 am
by Julio1fer
Beautiful dusk shots, Dennis. I like most the first one, with the moon just separating the two colored areas of the sky.
In these situations the moon is so much brighter than anything else that it appears as a small white disk, instead of the large textured orb that we perceive with naked eye. Some years ago I got so bored with the technical dilemma that I used to cheat with moon shots doing double exposures, a tele for the moon, exposing for the bright object, and then the landscape with a normal or wide. I tried to get the large moon image just over the tiny moon that the normal lens was seeing. Sometimes I would save the moon image for another landscape and use a red filter to blacken the sky in the second exposure.
Should be much easier with digital and Photoshop these days.
Blood moon here was about 4-5 AM, not a civilized hour for photography.