What do you take on tourism duty?
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:28 pm
When touring with the family or life partner, photography is probably a lower priority, but I guess that most members will carry something along. I am thinking of those special trips where you plan a lot and go to places where you probably will not come back again.
There are different ways of doing it , from the make-it-yourself gourmet trip where you rent a car and decide on everything, to the bus-group high efficiency trip (if today is Tuesday this must be Belgium, honey).
In any case, weight and convenience are important. You do not have much time for photography; tripods are out of consideration, and you cannot delay your family or group looking for the best composition for half an hour (as I would often do in other settings!). A small bag would be the most you would take along. Besides, in some areas you may have to worry about theft, and I do not want to be worried when I am trying to have fun on a trip, so I am reluctant to carry expensive equipment. Not that I have much of it, mind you.
Many of these considerations would also apply to those business trips where you get a few hours to fill in your schedule.
I am curious as to what are your experiences and ideas on the "tourism photography" issue.
I used to take along an Olympus XA, that has now been substituted by a Canon G-12, as main equipment. But I still take some film camera along, for the heck of it and also to get a different capture. I must use B&W in the film camera these days, because there is no good quality C-41 anymore in my area.
In the film role I have used a Pentax K-1000 (because of a zoom 18-28), 120 folders, good quality 35mm RF cameras, and once I even took a TLR. All of them worked for me. Always a single film camera (plus the digital advanced P&S), no room for more.
If you take a SLR or a 35mm interchangeable lens camera, the focal distances are another decision to make. In cities, I find myself using wide angles most of the time, typically 35 or 28mm lenses. Telephoto lenses are too large and heavy. It is not an assignment nor a job to do. I usually take a normal as well but I almost never use it.
More equipment means you can take advantage of more photo opportunities, but it also means more weight and inconvenience. I have found that two cameras total is the most I can handle with some comfort left.
What are your thoughts on this? what do you use on trips, especially with film?
Bag types or any other considerations?
There are different ways of doing it , from the make-it-yourself gourmet trip where you rent a car and decide on everything, to the bus-group high efficiency trip (if today is Tuesday this must be Belgium, honey).
In any case, weight and convenience are important. You do not have much time for photography; tripods are out of consideration, and you cannot delay your family or group looking for the best composition for half an hour (as I would often do in other settings!). A small bag would be the most you would take along. Besides, in some areas you may have to worry about theft, and I do not want to be worried when I am trying to have fun on a trip, so I am reluctant to carry expensive equipment. Not that I have much of it, mind you.
Many of these considerations would also apply to those business trips where you get a few hours to fill in your schedule.
I am curious as to what are your experiences and ideas on the "tourism photography" issue.
I used to take along an Olympus XA, that has now been substituted by a Canon G-12, as main equipment. But I still take some film camera along, for the heck of it and also to get a different capture. I must use B&W in the film camera these days, because there is no good quality C-41 anymore in my area.
In the film role I have used a Pentax K-1000 (because of a zoom 18-28), 120 folders, good quality 35mm RF cameras, and once I even took a TLR. All of them worked for me. Always a single film camera (plus the digital advanced P&S), no room for more.
If you take a SLR or a 35mm interchangeable lens camera, the focal distances are another decision to make. In cities, I find myself using wide angles most of the time, typically 35 or 28mm lenses. Telephoto lenses are too large and heavy. It is not an assignment nor a job to do. I usually take a normal as well but I almost never use it.
More equipment means you can take advantage of more photo opportunities, but it also means more weight and inconvenience. I have found that two cameras total is the most I can handle with some comfort left.
What are your thoughts on this? what do you use on trips, especially with film?
Bag types or any other considerations?