Page 3 of 3
Re: Trying again...
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 4:49 pm
by jamesmck
GrahamS wrote:I would say it deserves wall space........
Agreed. Do you find the shiny stripe on the nose distracting?
Re: Trying again...
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 5:50 pm
by GrahamS
Not really, James but once I start adjusting detail like that I may as well run the image through Portrait Pro and I'm not going there....
Re: Trying again...
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 6:13 pm
by scott
The shine doesn't bother me, either. I can adjust the curves on the scan to even it out, but the detail washes out, too. I like the contrast.
Graham, I'd never heard of Portrait Pro. Just looked it up. E
gad...
Re: Trying again...
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 11:39 am
by GrahamS
scott wrote:Graham, I'd never heard of Portrait Pro. Just looked it up. E
gad...
Beware!!! If not used with care, it can make your images look like waxworks.
Re: Trying again...
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 12:02 pm
by scott
I ran the image through noise ninja earlier. Quick and dirty, it made a difference. I'll try to optimize it when I get home...
Re: Trying again...
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:15 am
by Philip
Ahh, a bee from my bonnet: a year or two ago I bought a copy of PortraitPro as it was on at a special price. I tried it a few times but was horrified at even its most subtle results. I can see now how those death-mask-like portraits of movie stars (on tabloid cover pages, etc) get made. It was monstrous.
I take pictures of real human beings and, although I use lots of editing, I cannot imagine turning any of the people I know and photograph into -- as Graham says -- the waxworks that I got from PortraitPro.
[I will now resume normal discussion.]
Philip
.
---------------------------------------------------------
EDIT a few minutes later:
I thought I might be too hot-headed about PortraitPro, so I just tried it again, but I don't want to highjack this thread. So I'll start another one with my calmer response. . .